
1. WTE goes worldwide. Several Asian countries, including Japan and Taiwan, are the global leaders in terms of extensive use of waste-to-energy facilities. There are 780 WTE plants worldwide processing 140 million tons of waste per year. Courtesy: Waste to Energy Research & Technology Council
Overcoming Dioxin Challenges
In the past, there was a widespread perception that WTE facilities emit a large amount of dioxins, Castaldi noted. "The reality is that the total dioxin emissions from all U.S. WTE plants have been estimated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to be at 12 grams TEQ (toxic equivalent) of dioxins," he said. "However, before the Maximum Achievable Control Technology regulations under the Clean Air Act were enacted, they emitted about 10,000 grams TEQ. Now the major source of dioxins in the U.S. comes from backyard barrel burning, with levels at 580 grams TEQ."
According to EPA data, dioxin emissions from WTE generators now account for less than 1% of total dioxin emissions in the U.S., he pointed out (Figure 2).

2. Dispelling dioxin myths. Due to improved air quality control systems, present-day WTE plants no longer emit high levels of dioxin. Today, U.S. municipal waste incinerators produce less than 1% of known dioxin emissions. Courtesy: Waste to Energy Research & Technology Council
Benefits of WTE Plants
"Most WTE facilities in the U.S. process between 500 and 3,000 tons of waste per day, which provides enough electricity to power 2.8 million homes," he said. "Furthermore, WTE is compatible with recycling and helps to promote resource minimization. For example, WTE plants annually remove more than 700,000 tons of ferrous materials."
Another important advantage of WTE facilities is their positive impact on U.S. air quality, according to Castaldi. He emphasized that today’s U.S. WTE facilities have to meet some of the world’s most stringent environmental standards. They achieved compliance with new Clean Air Act pollution control standards in 2000.
In addition, as stated earlier, WTE facilities produce lower levels of greenhouse gas emissions compared to traditional coal-fired power plants. The EPA estimates that WTE facilities prevent 33 million metric tons of CO2 per year from being emitted, he noted.
"WTE facilities also save valuable real estate," he added. "They reduce the space required for landfills by about 90%."
Finally, one important fact not to be ignored during this challenging economic period is that WTE facilities provide positive economic benefits. "WTE is a $10 billion industry that employs more than 6,000 U.S. workers, and the annual wages exceed $400 million," he noted.
Future Outlook
In 2007, the U.S. WTE industry had 87 plants that used approximately 29 million tons of MSW as a fuel source. The net generation of these WTE plants totaled approximately 2.6 GW, and there’s potential for an additional 20 GW of WTE capacity in the U.S., which would be equivalent to saving 200 million barrels of oil or avoiding the mining of 70 million tons of coal and 420 million tons of overburden ore, according to Castaldi.
Abundant supplies of MSW make WTE electricity generation well-positioned to be an attractive and dependable source of renewable power in the years ahead.
—Angela Neville, JD is POWER's senior editor.
Comments (2)
Nice article and very informative.
While going through the report it was found that abt 2800 kwh of electrical energy can be generated from one(1) metric ton of Municiple Solid Waste.When I stated analysing this fact,I found that the said amt of electrical energy generation is not possible as indicated below:
2800 kwh = 2800 x 860 kcal (elect)
Assuming plant thermal efficiency of abt 30%,heat input = 2800 x 860 / 0.30 = 8,026,666.6 kcal
Gross Calorific Value of MSW =8,026,666.6 /10000 kcal /kg = 8,026.7 kcal/kg
To my knowledge GCV of MSW would be arround 2000 kcal / kg.
Infact 760 kwh / MSW indicted / MSW with methane gas generated is a realistic.
Kindly let me hv your views on abv at your earliest convenience.
with warm regards
R.P.Rao
isor
Editor-in-Chief Dr. Robert Peltier, PE responds:
For the calculations, I'll take a different approach.
1 ton of coal (2000 lb short ton) at 10,000 Btu/lb = 20 million Btu
The author says MSW heating value is 28% than of coal so 1 ton of MSW = 5.6 million Btu (2,000 lb x 10,000Btu/lb)
If the heat rate of a typical plant (efficiency) is 10,000 Btu/kWh, then the energy produced =
5.6 million Btu/10,000 Btu/kWh = 560 kWh
560 kWh is far less than the author's statement that a ton of MSW produces 2,800 kWh
I then decided to look on the web for some confirmation of my calculations. A statement from the ASME says that a ton of MSW typically produces between 500-600 kWh of electricity.
Once again, physics and math rule, and all's right with the world of engineering.
Therefore, I conclude that Rao's comments are accurate and the author is wrong in his estimates. In fact, Rao's estimate of the GCV (gross calorific value) of MSW of 2000 kcal/kg is generous. The real number is more like half of that.